Fair, Transparent and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes

The combination of increased availability of large amounts of fine-grained human behavioral data and advances in machine learning is presiding over a growing reliance on algorithms to address complex societal problems. Algorithmic decision-making processes might lead to more objective and thus potentially fairer decisions than those made by humans who may be influenced by greed, prejudice, fatigue, or hunger. However, algorithmic decision-making has been criticized for its potential to enhance discrimination, information and power asymmetry, and opacity. In this paper, we provide an overview of available technical solutions to enhance fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic decision-making.

Topics

AI and Statistics for the SDGs

Author(s)

Partner Organization(s)

Data-Pop Alliance

Share

Recommendations

HumanDev
Making Human Measurement Matter for Human Development: Towards a Theory of Change for the Data Revolution
FosCover
Recommendations Report: Increasing and Strengthening the Availability of Digital Sexual and Reproductive Health Services with Youth-Friendly Approaches
[P124] cover Bangladesh_Report
Towards Caring Cities: A Geospatial Analysis in Dhaka City
2 (9)
Mapping and Dynamics of Violence involving Youth and Children in Urban Areas in Port-au-Prince
[WEB] Feature Blog Post
Reflections on the Relevance of Updated, Standardised, and Reliable Data on Sexual and Gender-Based Violence for Research and Policymaking for Eradication, Response, and Prevention in Sierra Leone
cover-publication
Case Study on Tracking Research Influence on Gender-Based Violence Policy in West Africa and Latin America
GPAI
Towards Substantive Equality in Artificial Intelligence: Transformative AI Policy for Gender Equality and Diversity
WEBSITE Feature for Publications
Feminist Urban Design: A Gender-Inclusive Framework for Cities
African,Farmer,Stand,In,The,Green,Farm,With,Holding,Tablet
FAIR Process Framework
DALL·E 2024-10-09 14.55
Politics vs. Policy in Disinformation Research: A Systematic Literature Review