LWL #17 Green Tech: The Sustainability Conundrum

LINKS WE LIKE #17

As a data-driven organization, we dwell in the techno-scientific world, leveraging research, capacity building and community engagement around topics such as machine learning and AI to drive a people-centered Big Data revolution. Although sustainable development is one of the main drivers of our work, we know how large the environmental footprint of technology can be. Technology has the potential to drive innovations that target pollution, greenhouse gases, and overall quality of life, but it is also, undoubtedly, a cause of the problem.    

Promoting technological diversity and long-term innovation seems to be a priority in order to ensure sustainable development. In this week’s Links We Like we feature articles that target the sustainability vs. technology debate – are we caught in the cycle of using technology to mitigate the problems we cause with our prior increase in technological knowledge?

Mike Orcutt from MIT Technology Review explains that, despite the World Economic Forum’s hope on how blockchains, and distributed ledger technology (DLT) in general, can help heal the world, DLT poses a sustainability challenge in and of itself. According to Orcutt “many energy experts are convinced that blockchain technology has the potential to touch off a fundamental transformation of modern energy grids”, but powering blockchain networks use massive amounts of electricity. In 2014 alone, U.S. data centers consumed 70 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity, enough to power 6.4 million average American homes. This consumption, however, is still relatively low compared to other industries. For more information on peer-to-peer energy trading, and making the electric grid smarter through blockchain, click here.

Green-tech is not necessarily sustainable

A green-tech future is envisioned as one where consumers and producers figure as stewards of sustainability merely by engaging in the market. As so, with green-tech, the technology sector is poised for green growth. “Why the green-tech future is flawed” confronts individual’s consumption patterns and technologies, even when considered “green,” with what author Samuel Alexander claims is an irreversible ecological footprint. Changing purchasing patterns is not enough. It requires both changing behaviors, particularly reducing demand, alongside better technologies.

Interested in learning more?

Sign up for our newsletter here.

Share
Keywords
Author(s)
Share
Recommendations
Feature Blog Post kid with blur face_
Pausing Progress: The Uncertain Future of the DHS Program
3 (4)
Da Distopia à Esperança: Destaques do Clube de Leitura e Cinema (Re)Imaginando Tecnologias
3 (4)
From Dystopia to Hope: Highlights from the (Re)Imagining Technologies Book and Movie Club
Header-News-letter-HZ (4)
Our Latest Quarterly Update (Q1 2025) is Out!
FeatureBlog
Three Decades of Advocacy: The Enduring Legacy of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action
[WEB] Feature Blog Post
RightsCon 2025: Data-Pop Alliance Participation in the Leading Digital Rights Summit at Taipei
[WEB] Feature Blog Post-
Employee Spotlight #6: Meet Our Design Team
Feature blog Post
A Mudança de Verificação de Fatos da Meta: Uma Declaração Política na Era da Pós-Verdade
Feature blog Post
Meta’s Fact-Checking Shift: A Political Statement in the Post-Truth Era
Feature blog Post (5)
Employee Spotlight #5: Nelson Papi Kolliesuah